|
Zaid Kamaruddin and Lim Guan Eng
The Malaysian Government has recognised
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) more by breach
than compliance. In Malaysia, there is no equality before the
law; no right to a fair and public trial; no presumption of
innocence; no right to peaceful assembly; no freedom of thought,
conscience and religion; and no freedom of opinion and
expression.
The Malaysian Government has steadfastly
refused to ratify the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights and International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights since both came into force in 1976. Although
Malaysia has not ratified the principal covenants that have
flowed from the UDHR, it is required as a member of the United
Nations to uphold the principles of the UDHR.
Under the UN Charter, Malaysia has pledged
to take joint and separate action with the UN for the achievement
of universal respect for - and observance of - human
rights and fundamental freedoms. In addition, it is required to
act in accordance with UN resolutions and declarations on human
rights. Instead, Malaysia has deemed fit to publicly criticise
and question the application of these standards to the country's
political, economic and social context, especially in relation to
an ill-defined "Asian values" system. In customary
international law, all human rights are universal, indivisible,
interdependent and interrelated. The only way that States can
justify their non-compliance with customary norms on some human
rights is on the basis of a public emergency threatening the life
of the nation, or similar necessity: a criterion that does not
apply to Malaysia.
There is also no freedom from being
subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Instead, government agencies' use of torture - whether
consciously or unconsciously - is not only prevalent but is
gaining ascendancy in Malaysia. It is not surprising therefore
that the government refuses to ratify the Convention against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment.
Torture has been part of police and
government culture since the early decades after independence in
1957, but it has always been hidden from the public eye, never
seen as a burning issue that represents a gross violation of
basic human rights. Apathy to this silent culture of torture by a
large section of the public could be due to a host of factors,
among them feudal traditions, an attitude that criminals caught
should be tortured as a form of punishment and even a sense of
"public order".
Despite growing awareness, there was
little positive reaction from the public, as people have tended
to believe the government's denials or self-serving
explanations for unfortunate events that have led to torture. The
public has been moved only when cases of torture and beatings
have been caught on camera, completely repudiating the government's
lies. Nothing highlighted the government's total loss of
credibility more than when former Deputy Prime Minister Anwar
Ibrahim was severely beaten up the Inspector-General of Police
himself in 1998. The Prime Minister's attempts to avoid
responsibility by saying that Anwar Ibrahim's injuries were
self-inflicted only aroused anger and hardened sentiments against
such torture. Yet, the government has consistently denied that
torture exists within the security services.
The fight against torture will only
succeed when public support is galvanised to pass laws that not
only ban but also provide remedies to victims of torture.
Draconian laws that directly or indirectly encourage physical,
psychological or mental torture - the Internal Security Act,
the Police Act, the Sedition Act, the Printing Presses &
Publications Act and the Official Secrets Act - need to be
abolished or revised.
Judicial independence must also be
established to ensure that no evidence obtained under duress or
torture is permitted. Clear guidelines must be established which
requires heavy punishment for perpetrators, and compensation must
be given to the victims. The Malaysian Government must be
pressured to ratify international covenants, and is made subject
to the jurisdiction of the United Nations Human Rights Committee.
Finally, we can only succeed with public
support. As has been said, "Evil exists because good people
do nothing." It is time for good people to act.
Posted on 2001-10-24
|