|
I want
to deal with the judicial system of India as I go on talking about my son. The
sane old dictum of the Indian judiciary is that even if thousands of culprits
escape, not even a single innocent person should be punished. The fathers of our
judicial system were that particular that no innocent person should be punished
wrongly. But today our enquiry officers never care a damn whether the real
culprits or the innocent are the ones punished.
What is
it that we call punishment? Is it imprisonment? Is it being tortured in police
camps like Kakkayam? Although nobody has thought aloud about this, it has
disturbed me for some time now. Lock-up torture cannot be compared to
imprisonment, whether simple or rigorous. We are by now used to news of deaths
due to lock-up torture, and continue to hear of such deaths, yet they are not
called ‘punishment’. Meanwhile, the real culprits often escape punishment. When
things are looked at from this angle, it is not difficult to conclude that the
sublime dictum of the Indian judiciary, not to punish the innocent, is being
violated blatantly.
So it
was in Rajan’s case. There was never even an attempt to find out if he was a
real culprit or not. They just took him, tortured him and killed him. That was
all that happened. Somebody gave the police a list and they picked up people
from that list. Whether somebody was a culprit or not was irrelevant to those
police. None among these police officers were anxious about the future of a
young man in their custody.
Although
trained to use scientific methods in finding real culprits, none of the police
employed them. They found it easier to torture the accused. With such an easy
way, why resort to scientific methods? This is why I believe that the police are
only instruments of torture for the state.
When
after four days the principal of the Engineering College, Professor Vahabudeen,
had no information about the arrested students, he went to the camp at Kakkayam
together with a Professor George. Going to the police camp run by Mr. Jayaram
Padikkal in those days was like going to a lion’s den. But they decided to go
because they loved their students. I don’t know what words of praise can express
my gratitude to these saintly souls. When Mr. Padikkal was informed of their
arrival, he arrogantly instructed that, “I will meet the principal, but not the
other professor.” Rajan was dear to the teachers and other students at the
Engineering College, and was a
favorite student of Professor Vahabudeen. He took keen interest in his case
throughout, and still continues to do so.
Throughout
his college days, Rajan was staying with Professor Mohan Kumar and family. He
was a professor of mechanical engineering and the brother-in-law of Rajan’s
uncle. During my wanderings in search of Rajan, I had stayed in his house for
two or three days. One afternoon, Crime Branch Circle Inspector Mr. Sreedharan,
along with two other policemen, came there asking for me. They behaved very
nicely, expressing sorrow over the disappearance of my son. They gave me a lot
of advice too, among which I found one thing particularly interesting. They
advised me to read a book by the extremist leader Mr. K. Venu. Actually, I had
already read the book, but as I was not interested in discussing it with a
police officer I pretended ignorance. Only later did I come to know that
everybody in the house, except me of course, were ice cold, scared of the police
presence. The first thing I did the next morning was to pack up and move over to
a lodge.
Another
incident involving a friend of mine, Professor Viswambharan, head of the
Department of Hindi in the Government Arts and Science College, exposed another
side of the police culture. He was staying with his wife near the college. I
also stayed with this couple for a few days. The next week Circle Inspector
Sreedharan met them one night and shouted, “Where is your friend, that
professor?” He threatened them in typical police style. The police were trying
to prove that I too was an extremist. Unfamiliar with such situations, Professor
Viswambharan and his wife panicked. They didn’t sleep that night, thinking that
a great calamity awaited me. When I came to know of this I tried to console
them. The police behaviour was unpredictable.
I
tried to contact Circle Inspector Sreedharan, but failed. I realised later that
Mr. Sreedharan came to meet me knowing that Rajan was dead. I shudder to think
what sadistic pleasure these people had by treating a feeble old man in that
way.
Posted on 2004-09-07
|